Doctrinal Act of Denunciation of Interdictum and Consecration of Sovereign Legal Self-Representation

INSTRUMENT CONSECRATED FOR THE NEUTRALIZATION OF MECHANISMS OF LEGAL OR JUDICIAL SLAVERY, ACTIVATED IN FULL DEFENSE OF THE SOVEREIGN ORIGINARY INDIVIDUAL UNDER NATURAL JURISDICTION.

Issued by the Sovereign Founder in the full exercise of his unlimited will.

🛡️Sovereign Activation Instrument • Version 1.0

Nature: Legal Self-Determination • Unlimited Self-Sovereignty • Functional Legal Application
Preparation and broadcast date: July 14, 2022
Activation and publication date: July 28, 2022
Emission field: Entire Ground Plane • Supraterritorial Territory
Status of this Instrument: Consecrated • Reserved • Published • With Chained Operating Dynamics
Normative status: Supreme Ius Naturalis • Universal Law • Common Law • Universal Original Jurisdiction • Suprapositive Law

✴️Issued by Mauro Rojas — Living man with full power and self-sovereignty — Sovereign Founder {alertSuccess}

This translated version is provisionally activated and currently under sovereign curatorship by the Jurisdictional Authority of the ACJ–USOJ System. For full doctrinal and vibrational fidelity, please refer to the source instrument in Spanish: Acta Doctrinal de Denuncia de Interdictum y Consagración de la Autorrepresentación Jurídica Soberana ↗️ {alertWarning}

{getToc} $title={Table of Contents} $count={false}

⛤

From my Eternal Presence in Supraterritorial Original Jurisdiction,
I establish this Instrument for the restoration of my sovereignty
as an indivisible expression of Legitimate Authority.

☉

I. PREAMBLE OF SOVEREIGN TRUTH

I am Mauro Rojas, a living man with full consciousness as a Sovereign Original Individual who acts in Truth, Honor, Responsibility and Transparency.

This declaration is enshrined under the jurisdiction of the Supreme Natural Law, to reaffirm that no legal or juridical mechanism can suppress the full autonomy of the Sovereign Original Individual through coercion, fiction or imposed representation.

I reject any attempt at fraudulent contractual binding arising from any legal or juridical fiction systematically imposed from birth.

II. COMPLAINT OF INTERDICTUM AS A FRAUD MECHANISM

I declare that the legal fiction imposed by birth certificate constitutes a flawed contract due to lack of disclosure, voluntary consent and transparency.

The use of corporate names (formula: FIRST NAMES LAST NAMES) as a means of representation constitutes criminal fraud. Any attempt to associate the Sovereign Original Individual with fictitious entities violates principles of truth and justice.

A presumption of law ceases where truth prevails
A presumption of law ceases when truth prevails

III. Declaration of Sovereign Legal Self-Representation

I, Mauro Rojas, a self-determined living man in full action with absolute rights as an Original Individual and Sovereign Founder, pre-legal, pre-state, and pre-juridical, exercise my right to represent myself in any legal or legitimate venue. I deny any transfer of powers to third parties, including lawyers, officials, corporate or fictitious entities.

Self-representation is a sacred expression of spiritual, legal, and vibrational sovereignty and autonomy.

Arise, what is living?
I stand erect because I live.

IV. ON THE IMPOSITION OF PRESUMED CONSENT AND JURISDICTIONAL CHALLENGE

I, Mauro Rojas, reject and denounce all attempts to force me to submit to positive, state, or procedural jurisdictions that lack a revealed legitimate basis. All imposition is impermissible until proven otherwise by vibrational, legitimate, and operational evidence. I challenge all non-consensual jurisdiction.

V. ON THE RESPONSIBILITY OF OFFICIALS AND PUBLIC CHARGES TO THE SOVEREIGN NATIVE INDIVIDUAL

Every public official is subordinate to the Sovereign Original Individual who, from the private sphere, can demand accountability. Imposing legal representations or perpetuating mechanisms of slavery (including legal/juridical fiction and the interdictum mechanism) constitutes an aggravated crime, subject to criminal liability in international jurisdictions.

VI. NON-RECOGNIZATION OF LEGAL FICTION

I, Mauro Rojas, do not recognize any supposed or illegitimate impositions implied in contracts, representations, presumptions, or attributions derived from legal or juridical fiction. Imposing the use of lawyers in systematic processes of positive law implies subjecting the individual to a forced confession of incapacity, which constitutes a crime of interdictum according to canon law:

Crime of interdict: Code of Canon Law, canon 1332.

VII. POSITIVE REGULATORY SUPPORT, NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL

1. Ecuadorian regulations

• COIP – Art. 272: Procedural fraud is punishable by imprisonment of 1 to 3 years;
• Criminal Code – Art. 3: Ignorance of the law does not exempt from liability;
• Law 23.054: Ratification of the Pact of San José de Costa Rica, which enshrines the right to recognition of legal personality.

2. International regulations

• American Convention on Human Rights (Art. 3);
• UN Convention against Corruption;
• UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime;
• EU Directive 2017/1371: Criminalisation of fraud affecting legal and financial interests.

3. Customary Law and Common Law

Verdict CO/DUN/21/1 of the International Common Law Court of the United Kingdom: Any association of a living person with a legal fiction constitutes internationally punishable fraud.

VIII. FORCED CONDITIONALITY AND THE RIGHT TO COMPREHENSIVE REPARATION

I declare that, in extreme and exceptionally non-consensual circumstances, I may be forced—through structural, legal, economic, and operational blocking mechanisms—to use non-self-determined legal representation, in order to cease acts of direct harm, including but not limited to:

• Imposition of proceedings under non-consensual jurisdiction;
• Blocking access to personal, legal, and commercial resources without a legitimate order;
• Denial of the right to direct defense or self-representation;
• Operational institutional isolation;
• Coercion by public structures operating from fraudulent budgets;
• Judicial retention of bank accounts;
• Any type of action that violates the rights of the Sovereign Original Individual.

These conditions constitute forced acts, beyond my sovereign will, and their execution has the potential to generate a situation of operational defenselessness, for which reason I declare:

• The use of a lawyer in such cases does not imply a transfer of my sovereignty or authority, nor recognition of a legal or juridical fiction;
• This reactive act does not invalidate my sovereign status nor the full validity of my Universal Original Jurisdiction.

Given the previously mentioned conditions, the Right to Comprehensive Reparation, both moral and material, is automatically activated due to the illegitimate imposition of procedures that violate:

• The right to recognition of legal personality (Pact of San José, Art. 3);
• Constitutional due process;
• The guarantees enshrined in the Supreme Natural Law, the Common Law and international law for the protection of the Sovereign Original Individual or conscious living man in the exercise of his absolute rights;
• The guarantees enshrined and unlimited protection in Universal Original Jurisdiction.

IX. COMPREHENSIVE REPARATION FOR FORCED ACT AND JURISDICTION NOT CONSENT TO

I declare that, in the face of the imposition of coercive mechanisms that violate my operational sovereignty, including but not limited to blocking access to resources, denial of direct defense, application of procedures under non-consensual jurisdiction, judicial retention of bank accounts, ad infinitum, that force or pressure me to use external legal representation to cease the damage, and that constitute forced acts and beyond my sovereign will, they automatically activate the Right to Comprehensive Reparation, in accordance with the following principles:

1. Recognition of the Forced Event

• The use of a lawyer does not imply a transfer of authority or recognition of legal or juridical fiction;
• The Sovereign Original Individual, by virtue of his unlimited will and full sovereignty, always exercises his right to direct the narrative of events supported by the documentation of evidence of the harm committed against his integrity;
• The Sovereign Original Individual, in full exercise as Authority in sovereign jurisdiction, reserves the right to activate a file to document the damage committed, including but not limited to: facts, documents, agents and institutions, maintaining a record under permanent observation that may be published on its own jurisdictional platform, with full authority to apply the classification of the crime committed against its integrity;
• The Sovereign Original Individual will apply every instrument and process within its reach to publicly disseminate, through its official channels, the details of the forced act and the crimes committed against its integrity, applying the legitimate times and resources under its sovereign criteria;
• The full validity of the Universal Original Jurisdiction of the Sovereign Original Individual is declared, from which all the implications and consequences of the Forced Event are recognized.

2. Right to Comprehensive Reparation

Reparation must address material, moral, psychological, social, economic, financial, and vibrational damage. The Sovereign Original Individual freely determines:

• The form of reparation (economic, symbolic, restitutive, social, energetic, ad infinitum);
• The term for its execution, or failing that, a maximum term of 55 solar days is established from the notification of the forced event.

3. Positive Normative Foundations

a. Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador (2008)

• Article 86, paragraph 3: Expressly recognizes the right to comprehensive reparation as a consequence of the violation of constitutional rights;
• Article 11, paragraph 3: Principle of direct application of constitutional rights and guarantees;
• Article 10: Recognizes natural persons, collectives and nature as holders of rights.

b. Comprehensive Organic Criminal Code (COP)

• Article 77: Establishes the obligation of comprehensive reparation to the victim, including economic, symbolic, psychological and social measures;
• Article 78: Defines the mechanisms for implementing reparation, including the active role of the victim in determining it.

c. Organic Law on Jurisdictional Guarantees and Constitutional Control

• Article 18: Establishes that every judgment declaring a violation of rights must include comprehensive reparation measures;
• Article 19: Recognizes the possibility for the affected party to propose reparation measures.

d. Jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court of Ecuador

• Judgments such as No. 002-10-SIN-CC and others have consolidated the standard of restitutio in integrum, including symbolic reparation, guarantees of non-repetition and public recognition of the damage;
• The principle of victim centrality is recognized, allowing the victim to define the scope and form of reparation.

e. Reception of International Standards. The Ecuadorian Constitution directly incorporates international human rights treaties, including:

• American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR) – Art. 63.1;
• UN Principles on Reparation for Victims of Grave Violations;
• Jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on comprehensive reparation, life plan and satisfaction measures.

f. Internacionales

• Article 63.1 of the American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR): Obligation of full reparation by the State;
• Jurisprudence of the IACHR: Restitutio in integrum, life plan, measures of satisfaction and non-repetition;
• UN Principles on Reparation for Victims of Grave Violations: Right to determine the form of reparation.

X. THE POTENTIAL FOR INSTITUTIONAL FRAUD

I declare that, in the exercise of my operational sovereignty, I may be faced with legal simulations, systematic manipulations or procedural alterations that constitute acts of institutional fraud, understood as intentional distortions of the operational truth and against my legal and juridical status, whether in administrative acts, resolutions, contracts or processes under non-consensual jurisdiction.

Therefore:

• The right to advance doctrinal protection is recognized, active against any form of structural manipulation, whether intentional or not, direct or indirect;
• The demand for comprehensive material, symbolic, social, media and vibrational reparation is declared legitimate when an affectation derived from such patterns is configured;
• The Sovereign Original Individual retains full authority to determine the scope, form, and timing of such reparation, in accordance with principles of sovereign resonance.

XI. ON THE POTENTIAL FOR HARMFUL OPERATIONAL SIMULATION (SCAM)

I declare that, in the exercise of my operational sovereignty, situations may arise in which the imposition of narratives or institutional acts disguised as good faith is manifested, the ultimate purpose of which is to induce me to deliver value, power, time, attention, or sovereign original energy, to accept harmful conditions or to carry out acts against my autonomy, thus constituting patterns of harmful operational simulation.

Therefore:

• The doctrinal right to preventive sovereign alert is established against any institutional fiction that attempts to usurp my will or resources;
• It is recognized that these figures configure patterns of structural fraud, activating comprehensive repair protocols, including but not limited to public apologies in conventional and digital media;
• The power of the Sovereign Original Individual to define the means, content and times for the materialization of the reparation is consecrated, within a maximum period of 55 solar days from its doctrinal activation.

XII. RESTITUTION AND RATIFICATION OF ORIGINARY JURISDICTION

I enshrine the Supreme Juris Naturalis jurisdiction as legitimate, in which all Native Individuals are free, sovereign, and inalienable. Any obligation imposed through undisclosed consent is void. This Act is an operative instrument to declare full sovereignty and dismantle all mechanisms of fictitious representation or procedural fraud.

As far as natural law is concerned, the individual Original Sovereign is equal in his own power, not in an indistinct mass.

With regard to Natural Law, each Sovereign Original Individual is equal in his or her own power, not as part of an indistinct mass.

●
In Truth, Honor and without Prejudice, I consecrate this doctrinal act
as the cornerstone of my living jurisdictional architecture

So and simply • Now for then • Things standing thus
I am eternal essence • Sovereign Original Individual
The Word became flesh and is here
●

☉

EXPRESO
MANIFIESTO
I BUILD
ACTIVE
I ESTABLISH
I OPERATE WITH LEGITIMACY, SOVEREIGNTY, AND UNLIMITED WILL

FROM THE ETERNITY OF NOW.

⛤

●
Act enshrined as the cornerstone of sovereign restitution,
Issued by the unlimited will of the Sovereign Original Founder
to seal the legitimacy of its Authority and Sovereignty in perpetuity.
●

This document is signed, sealed, vibrated and consecrated with full consciousness, active will and living jurisdiction:

Mauro Rojas
Living man with full power and unlimited self-sovereignty
Sovereign Founder • Original Issuer • Custodian of Existential Value
Author of the Supraterritorial Original Jurisdiction
https://www.eonminu.biz • Jurisdictional Portal of the Sovereign Founder
This portal vibrates as a sovereign extension of living law.

✅ Published with legal effect on Thursday, July 28, 2022 [23:54 UTC+0]

●
Representation and procedures by telephone are not accepted;
As a notary public, the red fingerprint replaces the notary seal (in direct notifications)
HELL Y'ALL
●

EXCLUSION AND NON-BINDING

• The denial of this instrument by any entity, subject, or system constitutes an express act of self-exclusion from the scope of its application, binding force, and resonance. This clause does not grant the right of refutation, imposition, or interference; it functions exclusively as an internal jurisdictional delimiter.
• Rejection does not confer power, but rather the dissolution of the bond. This instrument does not engage in dialogue or defend itself against structures that do not operate in resonance with Original Law. Its validity does not depend on external recognition, but on internal activation. Such ignorance or rejection implies a lack of participation in its ontological reality, reveals a lack of vibrational discernment to operate in Original Law, and discredits its capacity to observe the correct legitimation of Autonomous Rights in accordance with the required procedural rigor.

{alertWarning}

PERMANENTLY ACTIVE UPDATE

• To ensure the effectiveness of this instrument in the eternal present, the Sovereign Founder reserves the right to update the document to strengthen its consecration in every action and act where necessary.

{alertWarning}

RETROACTIVE APPLICATION

• This instrument is activated as sovereign law with retroactive effect from its publication, reaching all actions, works, acts, projects, instruments, protocols, ad infinitum, created, developed, issued and published by Mauro Rojas, Sovereign Original Individual, throughout his career, and that by their nature, vibration and purpose, are aligned with his doctrinal architecture.
• Any reading, interpretation, replication, or activation must consider this retroactivity as an integral part of its validity, protection, and operational power. Retroactive integration guarantees vibrational traceability, jurisdictional continuity, and a supraterritorial shield against any attempt at invalidation, reinterpretation, or external interference.

{alertWarning}

★ Mauro Rojas

Eonminu^® The Brands Laboratory™ • The Business Architecture Exosphere^⟴

All rights reserved.

{alertInfo}

{fullWidth}